People’s Car or Richman’s 2nd Car?
The much awaited 1 lakh car was finally unveiled at the Delhi Auto expo yesterday. Despite the increased input costs and inflation during the 4 years of its making, it’s amazing that the price (for the basic version) remains Rs 1 lakh (dealer price)!. Tata Nano is here.
Before seeing the news yesterday, here’s what I had heard about the car (Rumors from various sources):
- It would be 2 door, 2 seater car.
- Top speed would be relatively low
- Safety would be compromised to keep manufacturing costs low
- No Airconditioning
- Power nothing (as in power steering, power windows et al)
Given all this, who would buy this car, I thought. Would we, the Indian middle class, buy a car that has compromised on a lot of ‘regular’ car features? Especially in a ‘loan driven’ market where one could buy a ‘regular’ car for affordable EMIs, and with the second hand market being very appealing.
Add to these the following considerations (derived from rumors above):
- it cannot be driven for long distances and is primarily a city drive car.
- It can carry only 2 people and has limited luggage space.
- People buy 2 wheelers not only because of their affordability, but also for convenience (given our crowded roads)
My thinking was that the market for this car would primarily be:
- folks who need a second car primarily for city driving.
- youngsters (on whom this will be forced upon by parents. A 4 wheeler is more safe than 2 wheelers, right? )
I wasn’t sure if the consumers for whom this car has been designed for (typical middle class families with 4 members) would form the bulk of the owner community, given that they aren’t getting anything much extra other than two additional wheels and a roof.
Now, here’s the reality:
- It is a 4 door, 4 seater car
- Top speed is 60 kmph (as quoted here)
- It has met all safety standards
- Air conditioning in Deluxe versions
- Larger interior space than Maruti 800
- Power ? (I’m not sure)
… and it looks cute!
Though it is much better than what the rumor mills predicted, the base Rs 1 lakh model is still not going to be a ‘regular car’. But it definitely would be a convenient, beautiful city car. But I am still confused about whether this is going to be a ‘people’s car’ or a ‘rich man’s second car’. Lets wait and see. But one thing is for sure - We will all get more Radio Mirchi time in traffic once the Nano hits the roads.
Stumble it!

4 Responses to “People’s Car or Richman’s 2nd Car?”
By Sanju on Jan 11, 2008 | Reply
Dude,
I need to comment on all your blogs… see u have a dedicated blog reader. Nice comments.
I feel this is going to be your ‘Chic Car’ - you couldn’t get any girls sitting on the back of your hero honda when you were in college, but with a car like nano i guess you could be the “cool guy” on campus - Now this is the cool guys car
Like the comment you made middle class parents could thrust it on their kids as this more “safer” than a yamaha or kawazaki. Ya i could have come to your house on this cute puppy instead of my Kinetic Honda.
My big question is where are you going to park this lil puppy. I cannot think of driving this on MG Road in cochin. Like everything in india - i guess when more people buy this car, govt will finally decide let’s have a multi storied parking lot and ask people to pay for parking.
By Nirmal on Jan 17, 2008 | Reply
‘Rich man’s second car’ is an interesting option. But its definitely going to be people’s car.
BTW are you planning to get one?
By Sampath on Jan 17, 2008 | Reply
:sanj - do keep commenting. Thanks. MLPLs could solve the parking issue. Good to see you are thinking
:Nirmal - hmm, you think so? …And no, i dont plan to get one. not a big tata vehicles fan
By Nishant on Jan 17, 2008 | Reply
The indian market would be an easy win, given the ‘bottom of the pyramid’ branding of the car and the expectant junta … the real challenge i guess would be taking this to other developing/3rd world economies as mentioned in the press releases during the launch and re-assert the commercial viability of the idea. You might find this interesting: http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0118/p01s03-wosc.html